STATE OF HARYANA vs CHANDER BHAN

-1- 119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-RS-46-2026 (O&M) IN RSA-438-1995 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 STATE OF HARYANA ...Appellant Versus CHANDER BHAN ...Respondent/Review Applicant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nischhal Manchanda, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Shukla, Advocate for the respondent/review applicant. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) CM-5844-C-2026 For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay of 25 days in filing the review application, the same is allowed. RA-RS-46-2026 Respondent/applicant by way of present review application has sought review of judgment dated 30.01.2026 passed by this Court in case titled as ‘State of Haryana Vs. Chander Bhan’. 2. The sole ground for review is that this Court while partly allowing the appeal preferred by appellant-State though had allowed respondent to choose permissible area, however, did not allow re- determination of surplus area/permissible area. It is argued that on enactment of Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972 the land was not utilized CHIRANJEEV SINGH 2026.05.14 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this doc