STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS vs SUSHILA DEVI

RSA-64-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-64-2026 (O&M) STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ..Appellants Versus SUSHILA DEVI ..Respondent Reserved on: 12.05.2026 Pronounced on: 14.05.2026 Uploaded on: ___.05.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate Ms. Aanchal Arora, Advocate for respondent. SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. The present appeal has been filed after the delay of 680 days against judgment and decree dated 06.12.2023 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Rohtak, whereby, appeal filed by the State against judgment and decree dated 19.10.2022 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rohtak was dismissed. CM-355-C-2026 2. The present application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is filed for condonation of delay of 680 days in filing the present appeal. MOHD AYUB 2026.05.26 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-64-2026 (O&M) -2- 3. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that delay of