SONU vs STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M-21842-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.242 CRM-M-21842-2026 Decided on : 19.05.2026 Sonu ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL *** Present : Mr. Dhruv Sihag, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana. *** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.361 dated 07.08.2024, registered under Sections 303, 13 of BNS, at Police Station City Hisar. 2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner alongwith co-accused had stolen the motorcycle of complainant. Hence, the present FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further contends that neither the petitioner was present at the spot nor was named in the FIR, therefore, he has no concern with the said offence. It has also been MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.20 15:51 contended that the petitioner was implicated in the present case only on the I attest to t