SONU AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M-62987-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 268 CRM-M-62987-2025 Decided on : 12.05.2026 Sonu and others ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, DAG Haryana Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2 SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL) 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of the below detailed First Information Report (FIR), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure P-2), effected between the parties. DETAILS OF CRIMINAL CASE:- FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station 293 19.04.2023 307, 323, 324, 506 r/w 34 City Rohtak, District Rohtak of IPC 2. Injuries No. 1 to 4 were declared simple, however, injury No. 5 and 6 were recommended for its review by Ortho Surgeon. Thereupon on 17.07.2023, said two injuries No. 5 and 6 were also declared simple in nature. Thus, broadly, only on views of the sharp edged weapon, and under assumption offence under REENA Section 307 IPC has been invoked. 2026.05.1