SONIA MITTAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 CWP-5285-2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2026 Sonia Mittal .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. **** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of appointment of Ayurvedic Medical Officer and to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on contract basis. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite his best efforts, he has not been able to get instructions from the petitioner and with the efflux of time, the prayer made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 4. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the present petition in case any cause still survives. 5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 18.05.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) Vinay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINAY 2026.05.18 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment