Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

SONEE AND ANOTHER vs UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRWP 6304/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SONEE AND ANOTHER
Respondent
UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRWP-6304-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.153 CRWP-6304-2026 Decided on : 26.05.2026 Sonee and another ...... Petitioners Versus State of UT, Chandigarh and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL *** Present : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. *** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to the official respondents to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents as they are in a 'live-in relationship' against the wishes of their family members. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the averments made in the petition, to state that both the petitioners are major and the dates of birth of petitioner No.1 and No.2 are 01.01.2006 and 10.01.2006 respectively. The copies of their Aadhaar cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively. The petitioners are stated to be in a 'live-in relationship', on account of which family members of the petitioners are giving threats to them. MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.27 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenti