SMT.HARBANS KAUR vs KASHMIR KAUR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (226) RSA-1955-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision:-13.05.2026 HARBANS KAUR … Appellant Versus KASHMIR SINGH AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Lakshya Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Adarsh Jain, Sr. Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Parminder Kaur, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Madan Lal, Advocate for respondents No.5 and 7. (Through VC) **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. Notice was issued on the last date of hearing to the sole appellant as learned counsel for the appellant stated that he is not in touch with the appellant. Notice has been received back with the report of death of the sole appellant. No LRs have come forward to get themselves impleaded on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the LRs of the appellant have lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 2. As such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stands dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also