Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

SML ISUZU LIMITED vs REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

Citation / case number
IOIN 1-CWP-20554/2017
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SML ISUZU LIMITED
Respondent
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

206 IOIN-1-CWP-20554-2017 SML ISUZU LIMITED VS REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS. Present: Ms. Krati Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate, for respondent No.1. shoe K As per office report, respondents No.4 and 6 could not be served for want of process fee. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she will do the needful within 15 days from today. On doing so, let fresh notice to respondents No.4 and 6 be issued. IOIN stands disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE 27.05.2026 deepak DEEPAK KUMAR, 2026.05.29 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh