SIRI KRISHAN vs CHANDGI RAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2026: PHHC 080421 (219) FAO-3649-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision:-21.05.2026 SIRI KRISHAN ... Appellant Versus CHANDGI RAM AND OTHERS we Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Ms. Ramandeep kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Divyansh Shukla, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. EH VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) l. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that she is not in touch with the appellant and despite repeated efforts, she has not been able to establish contact with the appellant. Even notices to respondents No.1 and 2 could not be issued through speed post as the appellant has failed to deposit the requisite speed post charges; thus, it appears that no one is interested in pursuing the present appeal. 2. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant appeal on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellant to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today. 4. As a natural corollary, since