SIMRANDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Brief facts of the prosecution case are that the petitioner, in connivance with the other co-accused, allegedly cheated the complainant on the pretext of investing money in a company with the assurance of earning three times profit. Hence, the present FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has no role in the alleged offence. It is contended that all the allegations regarding inducement to invest money are against co-accused Baljinder Singh and Amandeep Kaur, and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. He further submits MOHIT 2026.05.28 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document that the petitioner is a truck driver and has no concern with the alleged transactions. Learned counsel further submits that the main accused Baljinder Singh has already been granted regular bail and co-accused Amandeep Kaur has also been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala. It is contended that the case is based on documentary evidence which is already in possession of the investigating agency and nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner. The petit