Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

SIDDHARTH DAHIYA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 48602/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SIDDHARTH DAHIYA AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.48602 of 2025 -1- 259 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.48602 of 2025 Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 Sidharth Dahiya and another ..... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ *** Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Lathwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajiv Rathor, Advocate for Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed praying for quashing of FIR No.457, dated 15.08.2024, under Sections 238(a), 3(5), 304, 309(4) of BNS, registered at Police Station Kharkhoda, District Sonipat, Haryana along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed (Annexure P-2). 2. FIR in question was filed by complainant-respondent No.2 and the trial started thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from the affidavit/compromise, RITTU 2026.05.26 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M No.48602 of 2025 -2- annexed as Annexure P-