SHYAMWATI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.11261 of 2019 Reserved on: 04.05.2026 Pronounced on: 05.05.2026 Uploaded on: 06.05.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment Shyamwati …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Argued by:- Mr. Parveen K. Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate and Mr. Abhinav Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. None for respondents No.4 and 5. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. 1. This is a petition for quashing of the order dated 18.05.2017 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Faridabad in FIR No.264 dated 27.03.2017, registered under Sections 323, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station City, Ballabgarh, District Faridabad. 2. It is further a matter of record that an application was filed by the accused/present petitioner seeking re-examination of the injured/victim by a Medical Board. In the said application, it was alleged that the FIR was NEETU RANI 2026.05.06 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authent