Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

SHYAM SUNDER vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 14958/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SHYAM SUNDER
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-14958-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229 CRM-M-14958-2026 Decided on : 12.05.2026 Shyam Sunder . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. Dheeraj Narula, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG Haryana **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, seeking grant of regular bail, in case, FIR No.197, dated 12.06.2021, under Sections 148, 149, 302, 342. 379-B, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Dabwali, District Sirsa. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that after noticing of the facts, almost similarly situated co-accused, namely; Hansraj allegedly armed with rubber pipe, Surender and Chhinder, allegedly armed with dandas, have already been released on bail, vide common order dated 07.11.2024 (Annexure P-3), passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M-23804-2023, titled as, “Surender and another v. State of Haryana” and CRM-M-35769-2024, titled as, “Hansraj v. State of Haryana”. Further submits that since the role assigned to the petitioner is almost REENA 2026.05.14 02:25 I attes