SHWETA AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. 2. Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if the Senior Superintendent of Police, Panipat, i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 01.05.2026 (Annexure P-5), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major and their dates of birth are 02.01.2007 and 01.01.997, respectively. The copies of their Aadhar cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively. They got married on 30.04.2026 and the Marriage Certificate is enclosed with the petition as Annexure P-3. 4. Notice of motion. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.05 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. 5. At the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6. In view