SHUBHAM vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER

CWP-17903-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 148 CWP-17903-2026 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 Shubham …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. S.S. Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Vashishth, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana (assisted by Naveen Kumar, PHED, Division No.1, Gohana (Sonipat) *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to release payment with respect to work carried out by him for the respondent along with interest. 2. Learned State counsel submits that respondent No.5 may be deleted from the array of parties as it is not a necessary party. He further submits that competent authority would consider petitioner’s claim and if any admitted liability is found, it would be discharged within 6 months from today. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent may be subjected to interest @ 12% per annum. 4. In the backdrop, respondent No.5 is deleted from the array of MOHIT KUMAR parties and the petition stands disposed of with