Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-08

SHIV @ RAJAT @ SHIVAM vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 26021/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SHIV @ RAJAT @ SHIVAM
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026:PHHC:071950 Beeee CRM-M-26021-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CRM-M-26021-2026 Date of decision: 08.05.2026 SHIV @ RAJAT @ SHIVAM ... PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL Present:- Mr. Sanpreet Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. KEK H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (now Section 528 of BNSS, 2023), seeking quashing of the order dated 21.11.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1* Class, Jagadhri, Yamuna Nagar in case FIR No.133 dated 12.06.2023, under Section 21-B of NDPS Act and Sections 120-B, 307, 332, 34, 353, 506 IPC (now Sections 109, 61(2), 121(2), 3(5), 132, 351(2) of BNS), registered at Police Station Radaur, District Yamunanagar, whereby the bail/surety bonds of the petitioner have been cancelled and forfeited to the State and warrants of arrest have been issued against him. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial Court has erred in cancelling the bail and forfeiting the bail bonds of the petitioner as no prior notice or an opportunity of hearing was granted to him. He