SHEELA DEVI vs DR. VAIBHAV AGGARWAL AND OTHERS

-1- 122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3807-2026 Date of Decision: 06.05.2026 SHEELA DEVI ....Petitioner Versus DR. VAIBHAV AGGARWAL AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Rohit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been preferred under Article 227 of Constitution of India by petitioner/plaintiff being aggrieved by impugned order dated 20.03.2026 (Annexure P-7), passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri whereby application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC preferred by respondents/defendants was allowed. 2. In the present case petitioner/plaintiff had filed a suit for possession. Vide impugned order, petitioner/plaintiff was directed to affix ad valorem Court fees on the market value/contractor rate of the suit land as existing on 18.11.2020. Admittedly, petitioner/plaintiff is claiming to be owner of suit property and sought possession of suit property. Since petitioner/plaintiff is seeking possession of suit property by claiming herself to be owner, therefore, she is bound to pay ad valorem Court fees. There is no dispute with regard to her li