SHANTI DEVI vs STATE OF HARYANA

120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6015-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 4.5.2026 Date of uploading: 4.5.2026 Shanti Devi ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Sidhant Bhonsle, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana. ***** SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.95 dated 03.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 18 (b) of the NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station Lakhan Majra, District Rohtak. 2. The gravamen of the FIR in question is that the petitioner is an accused of being involved in FIR pertaining to NDPS Act involving 2 kg 800 grams opium, which was allegedly recovered from the petitioner and her co- accused. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has iterated that the petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.04 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh 2 CRM-M-6015-2026 (O&M) submitted that the mandatory provisions of