Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

SHANTI BAI AND OTHERS vs RAMMILAN AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 465/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SHANTI BAI AND OTHERS
Respondent
RAMMILAN AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

FAO-465-2026 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-465-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.05.2026 Smt. Shan" Bai and others ...Appellants Versus Ram Milan and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. S.K. Daaria, Advocate for the appellants **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Pawan Kumar, son of appellants No.1 & 2, and brother of appellant No.3, lost his life in a motor vehicular accident, which occurred on 15.09.2018. The appellants ins"tuted a claim pe""on under Sec"on 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensa"on from the driver, owner and insurer of the offending vehicle. Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, vide award dated 18.04.2023, allowed the claim pe""on and awarded compensa"on amoun"ng to ₹7,89,464/- along with applicable interest, payable jointly and severally by the respondents. 2. The present appeal has been preferred by the claimants seeking enhancement of the compensa"on awarded by the Tribunal. The appeal is accompanied by an applica"on bearing CM-2019-CII-2026 under Sec"on 5 of the Limita"on Act, 1963 for condona"on of delay of 885 days in filing the appeal. 3. In the applica"on seeking condona"on