SHANTANU PAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M-25780-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 144 CRM-M-25780-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.05.2026 Shantanu Pal ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the impugned order dated 25.04.2024, whereby the petitioner has been declared as proclaimed person in NACT-504-2019 titled as Faridabad Steel Mongers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Hambro Tech India Pvt. Ltd etc. filed under Section 138 and 142 NI Act. 2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was summoned in a complaint under Section 138 NI Act. He has resigned from the company, a copy of resignation dated 06.02.2019, acknowledgment and resolution dated 11.02.2019, have been appended as Annexures P-2 and P-3 and Form No.DIR- 12 was also submitted with the Registrar of Companies, Annexure P-4. Thereafter, in the said year as stated in para 9 of the petition, he had left for Gujarat. The summons were never served upon him and in the report, it was also recorded that no such person was found at the giv