Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

SHAMSHER SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 23445/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SHAMSHER SINGH AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23445-2025 Date of decision: 12.05.2026 SHAMSHER SINGH AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Surender Singh Pannu, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Deepak Jindal, Advocate for the complainant. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short - ‘the BNSS’), seeking anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.295 dated 22.04.2025, under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (for short - ‘the IPC’) and Section 24 of the Immigration Act, registered at Police Station Sadar, District Karnal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that there is no allegation levelled against the petitioners; the main allegation is levelled against the co-accused, namely, Neelam (wife of petitioner No.1) as the money was handed over to her, who is independent in her working; there is no evidence regarding the payment of any amount of Rs.21 lakhs except MANISHA 2026.05.29 10:32 I attest to the accuracy