Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

SHAMSHER SINGH ALIAS SHERA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRA-D 1222/2024
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SHAMSHER SINGH ALIAS SHERA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRA-D-1222-2024 (O&M) -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 CRA-D-1222-2024 (O&M) Reserved on : 25.03.2026 Pronounced on: 21.05.2026 Uploaded on : 21.05.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or the full Judgment is pronounced: Full Judgment SHAMSHER SINGH @ SHERA ... APPELLANT Versus STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. A.D.S. Jattan, Advocate (arguing counsel) Mr. Mandeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Additional A.G. Haryana. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. CRM-35702-2024 in CRA-D-1222-2024 1. Heard on the application for condonation of delay. 2. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as mentioned in the application, delay of 372 days in filing of the instant appeal is allowed for the time being, subject to the final decision to be taken by the Apex Court in case Writ Petition (Crl.) No.114 of 2024, titled as Sushila Devi & Anr. vs. Union of India through NIA & Ors.’, wherein the question as to whether the limitation prescribed under Section 45(2) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 is mandatory or not. GY