Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

SHAKUNTALA DEVI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
CWP 16217/2003
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SHAKUNTALA DEVI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026:PHHC:078722 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Serial No. 208 CWP-16217-2003 (O&M) Decided on:19.05.2026 Shakuntala Devi ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHTYA PRESENT: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J(ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing to the respondents to regularise the petitioner’s service. 2. Learned State counsel has received instructions from the Department vide memo dated 19.05.2026, which is retained on the case file as Annexure ‘A’ along with annexures. Referring to the same, he contended that the petitioner was regularised in service during the pendency of the petition in 2005 vide DEO, Sirsa order dated 15.03.2005. 3. In view thereof, the petition stands disposed of having been rendered infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (TRIBHUVAN DAHTYA) 19.05.2026 JUDGE Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes‘Ne MEHAK HURIA Whether reportable? ¥es‘No 2026.05.22 10:49 | attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/j