Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

SHAHID AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 16294/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SHAHID AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 258 CRM-M-16294-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2026 Shahid and Others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : None for the petitioners Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. As per the report received from the trial Court, though petitioner No.10 had appeared, however, had left without recording of his statement and it is a case under Section 307 IPC. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, despite the case having been called out twice. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 18.05.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.05.19 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document