SHAH NAZAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.39057 of 2024 Date of decision: 26.05.2026 Shah Nazar …Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. J.S. Jaidka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.1-State. Mr. S.S. Kalra, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.193 dated 09.09.2023 registered under Sections 454, 380 and 323 IPC, 1860 at Police Station Tibba, District Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) and all other subsequent proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR, including the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (Annexure P-2), qua the present petitioner. 2. Briefly stated, the complainant-Chetna wife of Paramjit Singh alias Pamma alleged that her husband had taken a hall on rent from Surinder Singh situated at New Company Bagh, Tibba Road, Ludhiana, where a factory was being run by them. It was alleged that disputes arose NEETU RANI 2026.05.26 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD CR