SH SHYAM ARORA @ SHYAM SUNDER ARORA & ANR. vs THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15th May, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1570/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15532/2026 SH SHYAM ARORA @ SHYAM SUNDER ARORA & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chaitanaya Parihar, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC (Crl.) with SI Anawesh Kumar. Mr. Narender Bhandari, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner herein seeks quashing of FIR No. 638/2025 dated 09.12.2025, registered at Police Station Krishna Nagar for commission of offences under Section 329(4)/332(c)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 448/451/34 IPC) along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The abovesaid FIR was registered on the basis of complaint of Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal who reported about illegal trespass and theft committed by Sh. Shyam Sunder Arora. According to him, his wife had purchased commercial premises situated at Krishna Nagar on 03.09.2025 from Mr. Bharat Bhushan Arora, his brother Ajay Kumar Arora and his sister-in-law (Bhabhi)-Sudershan Arora and peaceful possession of the same was taken. 3. According to complainant, on 08.12.2025, when he came to the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 1570/2026 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:16.05.2026 15:53:49 abovesaid premises, he found the locks broken and accused Shyam Sunder Arora and Chetan Arora inside their premises and, when they were questioned, they threatened the complainant. He reported the matter to the police with the suspicion that they had trespassed into the premises with the intention to commit theft. 4. Investigation is, though, stated to be over, cha