SAVITRI AND OTHERS vs ASHU AND OTHERS

115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** INCOMP-1030-2026 CASE TYPE: FAO Date of decision : 01.05.2026 Savitri and others ... Appellants Versus Ashu and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Param Mehta, Advocate for Mr.Naveen Mandhan, Advocate for the appellants. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present case was filed in the registry and the registry had raised certain objections which were not removed by the learned counsel. 2. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V. Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, a case wherein objections have been raised by the Registry, the same is to be taken back by the counsel/party concerned, to be re-filed within a period of 40 days. 3. Since the case file was not taken back for doing the needful by the learned counsel concerned, despite a specific note having been given in the cause list requesting the counsel to collect the case file for removal of objections, the Registry has listed this incomplete matter before this Court. 4. In view of the fact that no steps were taken by the counsel concerned for re-filing of the case after removal of objections, no order is called for on the judi