Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

SAVITA RANI AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 11515/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SAVITA RANI AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 128 CWP-11515-2026 Decided on 29.05.2026 **** Savita Rani & Ors. ... Petitioners VS. State of Haryana & Ors. ... Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL **** Present: Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. AG Haryana Mr. Arvind Seth, Sr. Panel Counsel, UOI **** Sandeep Moudgil, J. (1). The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners on their respective posts from the date of their initial appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the order dated 18.04.2026 passed by this Court in a bunch of similar writ petitions including in CWP-35408-2025 (Neeraj Rani & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors.). (2). Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel are ad idem and do not dispute the fact that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the dictum of this Court rendered in Neeraj Rani & Ors. case (supra). (3). Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of Neeraj Rani & Ors. case (supra