Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

SAURAV JOSHI @ AMBARSARIYA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 11876/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SAURAV JOSHI @ AMBARSARIYA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (207) CRM-M-11876-2026 Decided on: 06.05.2026 Uploaded on: 06.05.2026 Saurav Joshi @ Ambarsariya ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: None for the petitioner (s). Mr. Hemant Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab. ***** Sumeet Goel (Oral): 1. Apprehending FIR No. 227 dated 25.10.2025 U/s 115(2), 118(1), 118(2),126(2), 351(1), 351(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS 2023 (323,324, 326,506,149,148 IPC), at P.S. Division No.6, Jalandhar; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. 2. On 02.04.2026, the following order was passed: “Learned State counsel has submitted that the complainant stands informed in compliance of order dated 5.3.2026, earlier passed by this Court. However, none has caused appearance on behalf of the complainant. Learned State counsel has filed short reply by way of affidavit of Sanjay Kumar, PPS, Assistant Commissioner of NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.06 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh CRM-M-11876-2026 Page |2 Police, NDPS-cum Model Town