SATPAL AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 146 CWP-16598-2026 Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 SATPAL AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Vashisht, DAG Haryana Mr. Akshay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5 Mr. Ankur Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kushaldeep K. Manchanda, Advocate and Mr. Sakal Sikri, Advocate for respondent No.7 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents not to allow shifting/rerouting/diversion of 132 KV High Tension Transmission Lines over their property/premises without their consent and without grant of ‘Right of Way’ (for short ‘RoW’). They are further seeking setting aside of resolution dated 05.02.2021 passed by Gram Panchayat Nuna Majra. 2. The respondent No.7 is a real estate developer operating under the name and style of ‘M/s HL Promoters Pvt. Ltd.’. The respondent No.7-developer vide application dated 20.01.2021 applied for shifting of already existing and operational