SATNARAYAN SHARMA vs RAMAN KUMAR AND ORS.

CR-1926-2021 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CR-1926-2021 Date of decision : 11.05.2026 Satnarayan Sharma ... Petitioner Versus Raman Kumar and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Sarju Puri, Senior Advocate with Ms.Anjila Guru, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Babu Khurana, Advocate for respondents no.1 to 7. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 07.04.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Div.), Garhshankar, vide which the application of the plaintiffs-respondents no.1 to 7 under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint has been allowed. 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that one of the reasons for challenging the impugned order dated 07.04.2021 is that the plea of the respondents no.1 to 7 which they are now seeking to take in the amended plaint is contrary to the evidence. It is submitted that the case DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.05.12 18:26 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CR-1926-2021 2 is now fixed at the stage of rebuttal ev