Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

SATNAM SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 21217/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SATNAM SINGH AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 260 CRM-M-21217-2026 Decided on: 25.05.2026 Satnam Singh and others ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Jasdeep Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. None for respondent No.2. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 482 Cr.P.C.), seeking quashing of FIR No. 100 dated 07.06.2025, under Sections 118(2), 115(2), 3(5) of BNS (Sections 326, 323, 34 IPC), registered at Police Station Ghuman, Batala, District Batala and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 27.03.2026 (Annexure P-2), effected between the parties. 2. As per the report dated 05.05.2026 received from the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Batala, in compliance with the order dated 20.04.2026 passed by this Court, none of the parties appeared for recording of their statements with regard to the compromise. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners or respondent No. 2. It appears that the parties are no longer inter