Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

SATBIR SINGH DAHIYA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 12250/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SATBIR SINGH DAHIYA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-12250-2023 1 2026:PHHC:084879 shea IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12250-2023 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 27.05.2026 SATBIR SINGH DAHTYA ....-PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Amardeep Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Ankush Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No. 3. 2K SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the medical reimbursement bills of the petitioner in terms of the medical reimbursement policies of the Government of Haryana, ie. at the rates of PGIMER, Chandigarh plus 75% of the balance amount, alongwith interest @ 18% per annum from the date of submission of the bills till actual payment. Brief facts of the case are that that the petitioner is a retired employee of respondent No.2 who rendered more than 30 years of unblemished and ANURADHA 2026.06.11 22:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1225