SAT PARKASH BANSAL vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL BODIES

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 158 CWP-15399-2026 Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 SAT PARKASH BANSAL ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Manoj Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner states that by a public notice dated 13.04.2026, Annexure P-1, petitioner has been asked to vacate booth site No.4, Sector 4, Gurugram. He submits that instant writ petition was instituted online on 10.05.2026. Counsel states that impugned action has been initiated after civil suit filed by petitioner’s estranged son was rejected by the trial Court vide judgment dated 30.03.2026, Annexure P-5, under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. Counsel states that although petitioner’s son has filed appeal challenging the aforesaid order, but petitioner has an independent right to challenge the impugned order. 2. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon respondents. 3. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents and states that impugned order has been passed under Section 18 of the Ha