SARMUKH SINGH vs CHAJJA SINGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (210) RSA-1559-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision:-11.05.2026 SURMUKH SINGH … Appellant Versus CHAJJA SINGH ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. None is present on behalf of the appellant. On the previous date also, none was present on behalf of the appellant. Notice was ordered to be issued to the parties. Notice has been received back with the report that the sole appellant has left the given address and sole respondent has died. This is an appeal arising out of a suit for grant of permanent injunction filed in the year 1989. It seems that the parties have lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 2. As such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the cases on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stands dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pending. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) th 11 May, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned