Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF UT CHD

Citation / case number
CRM-M 15393/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV
Respondent
STATE OF UT CHD
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-15393-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 CRM-M-15393-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.05.2026 Santosh Kumar Yadav ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of U.T. Chandigarh ..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Gurbir Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P., U.T. Chandigarh with Mr. Dixit Bhardwaj and Ms. Sarasmi Budhiraja, Advocates assisted by SI Kulwinder. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. This petition for bail is the first petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.35 dated 17.04.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Cybercrime, Chandigarh. 2. The abovementioned FIR came into being at the instance of ‘Manish Aggarwal, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated by the above-named complainant that on 05.10.2023, he saw a notification in the newspaper with regard to opening of a ‘Toyota’ dealership. As per complainant, he downloaded the form from the link given