SANTOSH JINDAL vs GURMEET SINGH AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (210) FAO-2002-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision:-22.05.2026 SANTOSH JINDAL … Appellant Versus GURMEET SINGH AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. I.S. Kingra, Sr. DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. None is present on behalf of the appellant. On the previous date also, none appeared for the appellant. Only adjournment requests were being filed repeatedly for years. It seems that appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 2. As such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stands dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pending. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) nd 22 May, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.05.25 23:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document