SANJANA JAT AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 154 CRWP-5313-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2026 Sanjana and Another ....Petitioners Versus ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Arshad Khan, Advocate for the petitioners ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent No.2 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents as they are in a ‘live-in’ against the wishes of their family members. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the averments made in the petition, to state that both the petitioners are major and the date of birth of petitioner No.1 and No.2 are 26.07.2007 and 20.01.2005 respectively. The copies of their Aadhar cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively. The petitioners are stated to be in a 'live-in relationship', on account of which family members of petitioner No.1 are giving threats to them. 3. Notice of motion. 4. At the asking of the Court, , accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed