Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

SANDEEP YADAV ALIAS SULLI vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 17226/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SANDEEP YADAV ALIAS SULLI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.17226 of 2026 (O&M)1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 219 CRM-M No.17226 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 Sandeep Yadav @ Sulli ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate and Mr. Jeevanjot S. Kang, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the complainant. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): This is first petition for bail, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the ‘Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’. This petition pertains to a case arising out of FIR No.426 dated 18.12.2025 for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 111(2)(b), 117(2), 190, 191(3) & 324(4) [Sections 61(2) and 309(6) were added later on] of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and Section 25 of Arms Act, Police Station City Narnaul, District Mahendergarh. 2. Briefly stating the facts emerging from record are that the FIR of this case came into being at the instance of ‘Narender Yadav’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated by the above-named complain