Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-01

SANDEEP SOOD AND ANR vs SUNIL KUMAR (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LRS

Citation / case number
CR 3627/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SANDEEP SOOD AND ANR
Respondent
SUNIL KUMAR (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LRS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 CR-3627-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:01.05.2026 SANDEEP SOOD AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS VERSUS SUNIL KUMAR (DECEASED) THR. HIS LRS. ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate for caveator-respondent. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioners-plaintiffs for setting aside judgment dated 18.03.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned District Judge, S.A.S. Nagar, vide which appeal filed by respondent-defendant has been allowed and impugned order dated 16.03.2024 (Annexure P-2) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kharar, whereby respondent- defendant was restrained from alienating the suit property by way of sale, mortgage, third party interest as was fully mentioned in headnote of the plaint till final disposal of the suit except otherwise than in due process of law, was set aside. 2. It is the case of petitioners-plaintiffs that present is a suit for specific performance and if no stay of alienation is granted, they will suffer irre