Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

SANDEEP KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 19357/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SANDEEP KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

135 CRM-M-19357-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19357-2026 Date of decision: 21.05.2026 SANDEEP KUMAR ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Sajan Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, Sr. DAG Haryana. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been arrested. In view of the statement, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition as having been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered infructuous. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 21.05.2026 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No PUNEET SHARMA 2026.05.22 17.53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment