Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

SANDEEP KUMAR @ SANDEEP vs RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 22659/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SANDEEP KUMAR @ SANDEEP
Respondent
RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22659-2026 Date of decision : 14.05.2026 Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep .....Petitioner versus Rajesh Kumar and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 16.04.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Narnaul as well as order dated 08.04.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Narnaul (referred as Ld. Revisional Court) whereby stay granted vide order dated 21.01.2026, has been vacated and recalling thereof has been dismissed. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mahendergarh had appointed a receiver on the property in question, vide his order dated 24.12.2025 and the same was assailed by the petitioner by way of filing the revision petition before the learned Revisional Court i.e. Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul. He submits that at the time of preliminary hearing, the stay of the operation of the order passed by learned S