Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

SANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 15961/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15961-2026 Date of decision: 21.05.2026 Sandeep Kumar and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Ms. Pavneet Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Gurleen Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Kulvir Singh Benipal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Pratibha Bali, AAG, Punjab. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners and also to grant them all consequential benefits including counting of past service as per the judgments of this Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners is decided by respondent No.2 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Learned State counsel, appearing on advanced notice, submits that she has no objection in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 for time- bound consideration and decision of the legal notice of the petitio