Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

SANDEEP AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 62036/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SANDEEP AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 262 CRM-M-62036-2025 Date of decision: 11.05.2026 SANDEEP AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Onkar Singh Wahla, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Ms. Anjali Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of FIR No.655 dated 23.09.2023 registered under Sections 379A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, at Police Station Palla, District Faridabad, along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 31.10.2025 (Annexure P-2). VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.16 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-62036-2025 -2- 2. The above FIR had been registered on the complaint of Upendra Bainsla son of Jatan Pal Bainsla alleging to the effect that on 23.09.2023 at about midnight, he was returning to his house at Etmadpur from his rented accommodation situated at D