Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

SAHIL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 3049/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SAHIL
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 CRM-M-3049-2026 Date of decision: 04.05.2026 SAHIL ......Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Mohan Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paras Talwar, Senior DAG, Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of pre-arrest bail in case bearing FIR No. 366 dated 13.12.2025 registered under Sections 308(2), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Parao Ambala Cantt, District Ambala. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that pursuant to the order dated 21.01.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required for investigation of the case. VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.04 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-3049-2026 -2- Learned State counsel on instruction from concerned Investigating Officer corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigat