Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

SADIQ vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 26271/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SADIQ
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-26271-2026 (O&M) 1 217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26271-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 SADIQ @ SADIQ MALIK ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Abhijeet Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is seeking regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in FIR No. 291 dated 04.09.2025 under Sections 22 (c) and 29 of NDPS Act registered at Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar. 2. The case of the prosecution is that an FIR was registered on the basis of secret information, pursuant to which co-accused Abdul was apprehended with 1,032 capsules of PROXIOHM-SPAS weighing 645 grams. During interrogation, another co-accused, Sunny, made a disclosure statement implicating the petitioner as being involved in the alleged offence. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. No recovery has been effected from the petitioner and apart from the disclosure statement, there is no other evidence to connect the petitioner with