SABIR vs STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1523/2026 SABIR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. Kapil Khanna and Mr. Asif Khan, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with IO/SI Kajal Sandhu and SI Gurdeep, PS Seemapuri. Prosecutrix in person (through videoconferencing) CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 832/2025 of PS Seemapuri for offence under Section 308(2)/351(2)/64(2)(m)/79 BNS. 2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP BAIL APPLN. 1523/2026 Page 1 of 6 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb483 5d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2e ee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.05.12 05:48:33 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:12.05.2026 17:59:22 for State assisted by IO/SI Kajal. I have also heard the prosecutrix who has appeared through videoconferencing. Being herself a practising advocate, the prosecutrix submits that she does not want to engage any counsel. 3. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is as follows. The accused/applicant is a gym trainer, and the prosecutrix started visiting his gym, where they developed friendship. On one of the days, the accused/applicant allegedly administered some laced drink to the prosecutrix due to which she became unconscious and accompanied the accused/applicant to some place, where he raped her and cl