RUKSINA AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

CRWP-5642-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (113) CRWP-5642-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.05.2026 RUKSINA AND ANR ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 16 and take action on their representation dated 11.05.2026 (Annexure P-3). 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5642-2026 (O&M) (2) liberty, they