Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

RUKSHAR AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 8945/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RUKSHAR AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-8945-2026 (O&M) 1 2026:PHHC:087259 mee IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8945-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 29.05.2026 RUKSHAR AND ANR. .-.sPETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for the respondent-HPSC. ORK SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This Civil Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the final Result dated 16.03.2026 (Annexure P-24), declared to fill up the post which were vacant on account of the pending court cases, without declaring the marks of the petitioners and considered the candidature of the petitioners under open/UR category as the petitioners have not taken any benefit of relaxation, age relaxation or any other concession of any reserve category in the recruitment process for the post in question. keeping in view the facts and circumstances as set out in the present writ petition, in the interest of justice. ANURADHA 2026.06.11 23:40 I attest to the accuracy