ROSHANDEEN AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M-12948 and 16336-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of Decision: 06.05.2026. 210 CRM-M-12948-2026 Makhan Deen ....Petitioner. VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent. WITH 279 CRM-M-16336-2026 Roshandeen and another ....Petitioners. VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH --- Present: Mr. Vishal Munjal, Advocate and Ms. Bindu Bala, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vinay Malhotra, DAG, Punjab. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) Petitioner-Makhan Deen (in CRM-M-12948-2026) and petitioners-Roshandeen and Seefadin (in CRM-M-16336-2026), have filed the aforementioned two petitions under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioners, who have been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:- JITENDER 2026.05.07 14:18 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRM-M-12948 and 16336-2026 (O&M) 2 Name of FIR Date Section(s) Police District petitioner(s) No. Station 1. Makhan Deen 26 04.02.2026 132, 221, 109, 61(2), Mahilpur Hoshiarpur 2.Roshandeen 121(1), 262, 191(3), 3. Seefadin 190 of BNS 2. Role of the a